Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
Member
User avatar
Team: Traders
Rank:
Main: Bonehead
Level: 2447

Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 5:18 pm
Posts: 737
Post Bad concepts
1) Using a semi 3D engine. You're still on a 2D surface and doing silly things to simulate 3D, like using stars and planets as speed bumps... as pilots we'd NEVER fly into these things... we'd fly around them in LONG sweeping arcs.

2) You still need to loose the silly ass Blow Back effect. It is totally unreal and majorly detracts from game play. No intelligent being would pilot a ship that is going to go super nova 100% of time it is disabled. None of the ships have enough atmosphere to create the effect you've created. See 6 below.

3) APing needs a lot of tweeking.

4) Trade Slave AP need a much better guidance system... slaves should intercept their targets not play catch up. (If SS devs had programmed the Apollo missions the Lunar orbiters/landers would still be playing catch-up... except for a few little items... AIR, FOOD, WATER, FUEL)

5) Taking damage from stars... would NEVER happen... again we pilots fly LONG sweeping arcs around them and are never closer that a few million miles/KM. The concept that we'd fly thru a star or close enough to take damage is ludicrous. (Ships don't collide with each other, planets, moons or asteroids ... but stars... REALLY??)

6) Distances... UGH! SS really needs to sort this out and apply a realistic distance system... the idea that everything is measured in pixels (where pixels have no real meaning as far as distance goes) ... well it just SUX BIG TIME.

7) Because SS has no "Z" axis measurement you've created problems for 1, & 5 above that should never exist.


Mon Nov 14, 2011 3:18 am
Profile
User avatar
Team: Suns of Hades
Rank: Soldier
Main: LemonPrime
Level: 8087

Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 10:14 pm
Posts: 5747
Post Re: Bad concepts
Why did you come back?

_________________
Lemon/Meo


Mon Nov 14, 2011 3:22 am
Profile
Member
User avatar
Team: Traders
Rank:
Main: Bonehead
Level: 2447

Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 5:18 pm
Posts: 737
Post Re: Bad concepts
ELITE wrote:
Why did you come back?


If you have nothing worthwhile to add why not shove cake in your cake hole, instead of making worthless comments.


Mon Nov 14, 2011 3:24 am
Profile
Main: Beelz
Level: 1

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 11:57 pm
Posts: 1544
Post Re: Bad concepts
Bonecrusher wrote:
1) Using a semi 3D engine. You're still on a 2D surface and doing silly things to simulate 3D, like using stars and planets as speed bumps... as pilots we'd NEVER fly into these things... we'd fly around them in LONG sweeping arcs.

2) You still need to loose the silly ass Blow Back effect. It is totally unreal and majorly detracts from game play. No intelligent being would pilot a ship that is going to go super nova 100% of time it is disabled. None of the ships have enough atmosphere to create the effect you've created. See 6 below.

3) APing needs a lot of tweeking.

4) Trade Slave AP need a much better guidance system... slaves should intercept their targets not play catch up. (If SS devs had programmed the Apollo missions the Lunar orbiters/landers would still be playing catch-up... except for a few little items... AIR, FOOD, WATER, FUEL)

5) Taking damage from stars... would NEVER happen... again we pilots fly LONG sweeping arcs around them and are never closer that a few million miles/KM. The concept that we'd fly thru a star or close enough to take damage is ludicrous. (Ships don't collide with each other, planets, moons or asteroids ... but stars... REALLY??)

6) Distances... UGH! SS really needs to sort this out and apply a realistic distance system... the idea that everything is measured in pixels (where pixels have no real meaning as far as distance goes) ... well it just SUX BIG TIME.

7) Because SS has no "Z" axis measurement you've created problems for 1, & 5 above that should never exist.



Knew you couldn't shut up about this forever =P

_________________
Image


Mon Nov 14, 2011 7:56 am
Profile
User avatar
Main: Obesity
Level: 2249

Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 4:33 am
Posts: 2127
Post Re: Bad concepts
Note to 5: We dont collide with the stars, we just get close enough that our ships gets damaged from radiation and heat (i guess) :P

_________________
JeffL wrote:
I stopped being able to totally understand that function years ago. Too long since I wrote it, and now it's all confusing. =)

The Voomy One wrote:
You gotta be shitting me >_<


Mon Nov 14, 2011 9:02 am
Profile
User avatar
Team: Eminence Front
Rank:
Main: Radia
Level: 1100

Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 6:04 pm
Posts: 6410
Location: q3dm17
Post Re: Bad concepts
On a related note, I have noticed a sharp increase of damaging stars. It's annoying.

The entire z-axis thing is just... odd. Speed bump planets really hurt immersion. And trying to figure out how bullets collide with planets and suns is confusing at best.

_________________
Jey123456 wrote: That will happen in a future closer than most futures.
No Context.
Idaten.
bageese wrote:
We've been against saying any solid dates until we know for sure when something is coming in.
:lol:


Mon Nov 14, 2011 1:20 pm
Profile WWW
over 9000!
User avatar
Main: enkelin
Level: 5600

Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 12:28 pm
Posts: 11109
Post Re: Bad concepts
They aren't really speed bumps; your horizontal speed stays the same while you traverse objects, while your vertical speed increases and decreases accordingly.

Maybe it would be better for immersion if your horizontal speed actually did decrease when traveling up and down the Z axis (that is, if your total speed in 3D stayed constant).

_________________
Hi, I'm Anil, a long-time player turned developer. I am Star Sonata's lead content developer, which means that I run weekly dev meetings and make sure that any proposed changes to the game receive proper review before going live.

http://www.starsonata.com/features


Mon Nov 14, 2011 1:50 pm
Profile
User avatar
Team: Eminence Back
Rank: Officer
Main: Pure Evil
Level: 5292

Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2004 7:20 am
Posts: 1595
Location: UK > Wales > Bin+ computer with boardband :p
Post Re: Bad concepts
Like I said before ALL PLANETS, SUNS, MOONS should be below the players z axis!

You'll think they'll listen or even attempt to do this? no

_________________
Fibre broadband in my brainzz!


Mon Nov 14, 2011 5:13 pm
Profile
User avatar
Team: Eminence Front
Rank:
Main: Radia
Level: 1100

Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 6:04 pm
Posts: 6410
Location: q3dm17
Post Re: Bad concepts
Markoz wrote:
Like I said before ALL PLANETS, SUNS, MOONS should be below the players z axis!

You'll think they'll listen or even attempt to do this? no
Even if they were halfway submerged, it would help relieve the jarring effect on immersion. The only problem I see is bullets hitting planets/moons/suns would no longer make any sense. This is where the 2.5D thing causes problems.

_________________
Jey123456 wrote: That will happen in a future closer than most futures.
No Context.
Idaten.
bageese wrote:
We've been against saying any solid dates until we know for sure when something is coming in.
:lol:


Mon Nov 14, 2011 5:33 pm
Profile WWW
over 9000!
User avatar
Team: Axis Industries
Rank: Councilor
Main: Churchill
Level: 5620

Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:36 pm
Posts: 11706
Post Re: Bad concepts
IMO, planets, moons, roids, and suns should act as physical objects, with larger graphical and orbital sizes. Roids stay small and numerous.

Physical as if you run into a planet fast enough, you bounce off the atmosphere/surface. You could use them as cover, and imo, remove the ethrealness from eth weapons, beefing stats to compensate.

_________________
Salt Assault drew this conclusion from the latest devblog.
[img]http://oi62.tinypic.com/33208ex.jpg[/img]


Mon Nov 14, 2011 5:37 pm
Profile
User avatar
Team: Eminence Back
Rank: Officer
Main: Pure Evil
Level: 5292

Joined: Fri Dec 31, 2004 7:20 am
Posts: 1595
Location: UK > Wales > Bin+ computer with boardband :p
Post Re: Bad concepts
Battlecruiser23 wrote:
IMO, planets, moons, roids, and suns should act as physical objects, with larger graphical and orbital sizes. Roids stay small and numerous.

Physical as if you run into a planet fast enough, you bounce off the atmosphere/surface. You could use them as cover, and imo, remove the ethrealness from eth weapons, beefing stats to compensate.


Also from before suggested all non ethereal weapons would be automatically attracted to the planets gravity causing the same effect. Of course this will be ignored.

_________________
Fibre broadband in my brainzz!


Mon Nov 14, 2011 5:50 pm
Profile
Content Dev
User avatar
Team: JMC
Rank: Director
Main: Blue Dwarf
Level: 2067

Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2011 5:39 pm
Posts: 3336
Post Re: Bad concepts
My only dislike is that ships go up and down over solar bodies and don't pitch at all. Which makes the whole motion rather, odd. It's probably worse on Speed Demons.

Concussions aren't going, they're too useful, you have the + inertia dampening capacitors, use them.

The new AP code is, well... New it'll be improved, but priorities right now lay with getting the clients to work for people they don't, and fixing things that cause crashes.

I don't see why these 'flying through suns' are only problems now, when in C1 everything was on the same plane. If we sink solar bodies, docking and building bases will be really weird. This could lead to full 3D maybe in the future (no idea, not a programmer). Although that could be really sketchy for Speed Demons. :P

_________________
"What you mean you killed him cha cha cha?!"

Support


Thu Nov 17, 2011 4:47 pm
Profile
User avatar
Team: Eminence Front
Rank:
Main: Radia
Level: 1100

Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 6:04 pm
Posts: 6410
Location: q3dm17
Post Re: Bad concepts
Bases could be right below the field of play. It looks odd when a ship can fly right through a base. But if it were to just fly over the base and scratch the paint off, it wouldn't be too bad.

_________________
Jey123456 wrote: That will happen in a future closer than most futures.
No Context.
Idaten.
bageese wrote:
We've been against saying any solid dates until we know for sure when something is coming in.
:lol:


Thu Nov 17, 2011 4:57 pm
Profile WWW
Content Dev
User avatar
Team: JMC
Rank: Director
Main: Blue Dwarf
Level: 2067

Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2011 5:39 pm
Posts: 3336
Post Re: Bad concepts
The problem with that is due to how its coded, we can't fly over bases and have bases fly over planets or something like that, so it's one or the other (again, not a programmer, don't really know).

It's hard to make a system much better than the current one (without some tweaks the current one of course), without going back to 2D or going full 3D.

_________________
"What you mean you killed him cha cha cha?!"

Support


Thu Nov 17, 2011 5:09 pm
Profile
User avatar
Team: Eminence Front
Rank:
Main: Radia
Level: 1100

Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 6:04 pm
Posts: 6410
Location: q3dm17
Post Re: Bad concepts
Bases going over planets is even worse! Just code the gal generator to never put an ai base where a planet will orbit into it. I'm not sure what to do with playerbases in that regard, but they shouldn't play keep away when a planet comes near.

_________________
Jey123456 wrote: That will happen in a future closer than most futures.
No Context.
Idaten.
bageese wrote:
We've been against saying any solid dates until we know for sure when something is coming in.
:lol:


Thu Nov 17, 2011 5:17 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 67 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.