Star Sonata
http://forum.starsonata.com/

"Iq' Bana In Color"; ca. 2009
http://forum.starsonata.com/viewtopic.php?f=113&t=57824
Page 2 of 2

Author:  thecrazygamemaster [ Thu Mar 27, 2014 12:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: "Iq' Bana In Color"; ca. 2009

starwyrm wrote:
first, did the guys in the pic win? second, how does C1 look SOOOOO much better than c2 with WORSE graphics?


The C2 implementation of what 3D can do wasn't very well designed.

Author:  Badgerlost [ Wed Oct 01, 2014 7:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: "Iq' Bana In Color"; ca. 2009

starwyrm wrote:
first, did the guys in the pic win? second, how does C1 look SOOOOO much better than c2 with WORSE graphics?


Of you can't see that them C1 graphics are epic then I suggest you get your eyes tested.

I want to see a scary looking ship shooting real bad ass weapons.

Not like the C2 shit we have now flying bubbles and blowing bubbles at each other.

Author:  DarkSteel [ Wed Oct 01, 2014 7:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: "Iq' Bana In Color"; ca. 2009

Jey posted about the engines graphics a few weeks ago. People were asking for C1 looking engine graphics again. Jey said it's very hard to pull off due to the diffrent camera angles C2 allows. I imagine it's exactly the same with the weapon graphics.

Author:  Rounder [ Wed Oct 01, 2014 8:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: "Iq' Bana In Color"; ca. 2009

If SS gets some money/resources later, would be worth looking into making actual graphics. Seems like C1 was pretty damn good sprite graphics, whereas C2 is just really shitty 3d graphics (FF 6 vs. FF 7 anyone?).

Author:  ELITE [ Wed Oct 01, 2014 9:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: "Iq' Bana In Color"; ca. 2009

#c1fohlyfe

Author:  MasterTrader [ Wed Oct 01, 2014 10:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: "Iq' Bana In Color"; ca. 2009

heylo wrote:
Jey posted about the engines graphics a few weeks ago. People were asking for C1 looking engine graphics again. Jey said it's very hard to pull off due to the diffrent camera angles C2 allows. I imagine it's exactly the same with the weapon graphics.


The only reason its hard is because they want to allow that stupid camera angle shit. I think Blue, or Vert, are the ones that said it wouldn't be very hard (or take very long) to get C1 looking engines if the camera angle never changed and the game was forced into an Orthographic Camera.

Author:  redalert150 [ Thu Oct 02, 2014 2:25 am ]
Post subject:  Re: "Iq' Bana In Color"; ca. 2009

3D so stupid. C1 = <3

Author:  DarkSteel [ Thu Oct 02, 2014 4:35 am ]
Post subject:  Re: "Iq' Bana In Color"; ca. 2009

MasterTrader wrote:
heylo wrote:
Jey posted about the engines graphics a few weeks ago. People were asking for C1 looking engine graphics again. Jey said it's very hard to pull off due to the diffrent camera angles C2 allows. I imagine it's exactly the same with the weapon graphics.


The only reason its hard is because they want to allow that stupid camera angle shit. I think Blue, or Vert, are the ones that said it wouldn't be very hard (or take very long) to get C1 looking engines if the camera angle never changed and the game was forced into an Orthographic Camera.


Exactly.

Author:  ELITE [ Thu Oct 02, 2014 8:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: "Iq' Bana In Color"; ca. 2009

heylo wrote:
MasterTrader wrote:
heylo wrote:
Jey posted about the engines graphics a few weeks ago. People were asking for C1 looking engine graphics again. Jey said it's very hard to pull off due to the diffrent camera angles C2 allows. I imagine it's exactly the same with the weapon graphics.


The only reason its hard is because they want to allow that stupid camera angle shit. I think Blue, or Vert, are the ones that said it wouldn't be very hard (or take very long) to get C1 looking engines if the camera angle never changed and the game was forced into an Orthographic Camera.


Exactly.



So can we just move Orthographic Camera from a toggle option that's in alpha, to a forced way of being?

I'm still against fucking speed bumps (lol jk they are suns/planets).

Author:  DarkSteel [ Fri Oct 03, 2014 3:36 am ]
Post subject:  Re: "Iq' Bana In Color"; ca. 2009

ELITE wrote:


So can we just move Orthographic Camera from a toggle option that's in alpha, to a forced way of being?

I'm still against fucking speed bumps (lol jk they are suns/planets).


Devs already said they'd never do this :P
They want to keep the diffrent camera angles.

Author:  andsimo [ Fri Oct 03, 2014 3:38 am ]
Post subject:  Re: "Iq' Bana In Color"; ca. 2009

Are there different camera angles? How do you change it?

Author:  DarkSteel [ Fri Oct 03, 2014 3:39 am ]
Post subject:  Re: "Iq' Bana In Color"; ca. 2009

If you dont have ortho cam enabled you can change it by pressing page up and page down.

Author:  Golfman560 [ Fri Oct 03, 2014 8:07 am ]
Post subject:  Re: "Iq' Bana In Color"; ca. 2009

heylo wrote:
If you dont have ortho cam enabled you can change it by pressing page up and page down.


No. Fucking. Way. Thats awesome

Author:  DarkSteel [ Fri Oct 03, 2014 8:41 am ]
Post subject:  Re: "Iq' Bana In Color"; ca. 2009

It is, for a bit. Untill you do combat and you realise its a horrible camera angle for fighting :P. Most people use ortho cam so you get a better overview and it makes the speedbumps lemon was talking about away. For that reason, most people would gladly give up the camera angles for better particle graphics.

Author:  biggee531 [ Fri Oct 03, 2014 9:59 am ]
Post subject:  Re: "Iq' Bana In Color"; ca. 2009

Irrlicht has some pretty awesome particle emitters, it would just take someone diving into it and figuring out how the fancy stuff works.

Page 2 of 2 All times are UTC - 5 hours
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/