Author |
Message |
Madridista
Team: Rank: Director Main: Casillas Level: 6 Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 7:03 pm Posts: 706
|
Re: Infero 2 (TLC) No Bull surrenders
Death to TLC!
_________________ Giovani dos Santos ... Olé!
|
Sat Nov 26, 2011 5:42 pm |
|
|
Madridista
Team: Rank: Director Main: Casillas Level: 6 Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 7:03 pm Posts: 706
|
Re: Infero 2 (TLC) No Bull surrenders
EwanB wrote: I wil protect No Bull since im trying to change my urmm..this is hard for me to say but...to change my "asshole" behavior..good time to start.
TLC you are KoS untill you re-funded everything to NB!
(Ps plz god let me go into heaven for this satan doesnt want me no more:( ) I will also defend No Bull.
_________________ Giovani dos Santos ... Olé!
|
Sat Nov 26, 2011 6:16 pm |
|
|
zhuang281
Team: Rank: Officer Main: Dark Phantom Level: 4762 Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 8:24 pm Posts: 1892 Location: In Phatnoms world
|
Re: Infero 2 (TLC) No Bull surrenders
So its ok to take sides now?
_________________ [CENTER][URL=http://www.nodiatis.com/personality.htm][IMG]http://www.nodiatis.com/pub/19.jpg[/IMG][/URL][/CENTER]
|
Sat Nov 26, 2011 6:20 pm |
|
|
reyjalrmm
Team: Rank: Officer Main: TheShaftofDiscipline Level: 3180 Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 1:28 pm Posts: 1186
|
Re: Infero 2 (TLC) No Bull surrenders
Shroud wrote: No Bull has been beaten down for about three years now. If any team deserves to prosper it's them. Teams do not deserve to prosper in pvp games, teams prosper because they work efficiently toward goals.
_________________ All your base are belong to us. (They set us up the bomb!)
|
Sat Nov 26, 2011 7:07 pm |
|
|
Shroud
Main: Bone Shroud Level: 40
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 9:44 pm Posts: 296 Location: Rockford, IL, U.S.A
|
Re: Infero 2 (TLC) No Bull surrenders
reyjalrmm wrote: Shroud wrote: No Bull has been beaten down for about three years now. If any team deserves to prosper it's them. Teams do not deserve to prosper in pvp games, teams prosper because they work efficiently toward goals. Yea, but you know what I mean. They've been sticking around for longer than most top teams have.
_________________ [quote="Belliaum"]I fear for the future of SS.[/quote]
[quote="JeffL"]Come have sex with me in space, my lord. [/quote]
|
Sat Nov 26, 2011 7:32 pm |
|
|
Faint
Team: Rank: Main: Faint Level: 2290 Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 6:22 pm Posts: 147 Location: Fl
|
Re: Infero 2 (TLC) No Bull surrenders
Our team was doing extremly well until recently. we have zerkers/shm/engis/SD's all capable of doing some damage..were just tweaking em up and upgrading as we go..we got tons of work to do and were gonna get better. no matter what team im on in the future either this team will never die. Also TLC can hide behind the fact that i shot first..but a few shots fired at the start of a uni is not a reason for war and overkilling. everyone i know agrees. Sorry TLC for our problems..be glad u found me and not somone with an alt on SP or DM or something.
|
Sat Nov 26, 2011 8:27 pm |
|
|
shawn_mccall
Team: Rank: Main: Paladin's Presence Level: 3937 Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 12:53 am Posts: 6770
|
Re: Infero 2 (TLC) No Bull surrenders
Madridista wrote: Death to TLC! I agree. It should have stopped when they moved. TLC attacking after that is the biggest piece of shit move I have yet seen.
Give 'em hell wex.
_________________
Neba wrote: BLACK PEOPLE DON'T GET RICE
andezrhode wrote: goett wrote: All oly ships look way to geometrically conservative for my tastes. thats because most graphic designers are squares
goett wrote: Fired bullets taste like candy.
|
Sat Nov 26, 2011 11:06 pm |
|
|
DITKA
Team: Rank: Officer Main: Lady Gaga Level: 3614 Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 4:06 pm Posts: 414
|
Re: Infero 2 (TLC) No Bull surrenders
I don't really care, this doesn't affect my economy.
_________________
|
Sat Nov 26, 2011 11:44 pm |
|
|
Chaosking3
Main: Spatzz Level: 3104
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 12:40 am Posts: 3122
|
Re: Infero 2 (TLC) No Bull surrenders
No Bull was the obvious antagonist here, I'll defend TLC, fuck you Wex!
_________________
JeffL wrote: Come have sex with me in space, my lord
|
Sat Nov 26, 2011 11:48 pm |
|
|
playerboy345
Team: Rank: Main: playerboy345 Level: 3084 Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2009 10:25 am Posts: 4062 Location: The Netherlands
|
Re: Infero 2 (TLC) No Bull surrenders
Chaosking3 wrote: No Bull was the obvious antagonist here, I'll defend TLC, fuck you Wex! This^
_________________
JeffL wrote: because we can and it looks really cool
The Voomy One wrote: Quote: Runescape, Allows you to change your name every 30 days. Runescape sucks so it doesnt count
|
Sun Nov 27, 2011 7:50 am |
|
|
EwanB
Main: Capt Cool Level: 0
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 9:51 am Posts: 1112
|
Re: Infero 2 (TLC) No Bull surrenders
okay more scraps for me.
|
Sun Nov 27, 2011 8:35 am |
|
|
NewFound
Team: Rank: Operator Main: Dream Wolf Level: 5855 Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2011 11:31 am Posts: 961
|
Re: Infero 2 (TLC) No Bull surrenders
Want to join my new team "super kwl destoya guys" Wex?
|
Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:16 am |
|
|
EwanB
Main: Capt Cool Level: 0
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 9:51 am Posts: 1112
|
Re: Infero 2 (TLC) No Bull surrenders
Only if spatzz can come to
|
Sun Nov 27, 2011 10:41 am |
|
|
goett
Team: Rank: Main: goett Level: 2156 Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 1:36 pm Posts: 1832
|
Re: Infero 2 (TLC) No Bull surrenders
Refund is in order. Any team that takes aggressions out of reset day is a bully IMO. Legion did it once to pants and it's just bad policy, we learned our lesson.
Would like church's opinion on his team's behavior. He's a trusted source.
|
Sun Nov 27, 2011 11:44 am |
|
|
stifler
Team: Rank: Soldier Main: Lt.Stifler Level: 2630 Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 8:53 pm Posts: 260
|
Re: Infero 2 (TLC) No Bull surrenders
As I can see, all the members from TLC were on Blazing Angels & as I can remember Blazing Angels were an aggressive team making up any excuse to attack smaller teams, if any story to believe I would believe No Bull is telling the truth (plus No Bull is a friendly and very peaceful team)
But as my Director says, we need Churchy here!
_________________ I is Cstrike
|
Wed Dec 07, 2011 11:30 pm |
|
|
|