Star Sonata http://forum.starsonata.com/ |
|
Protected Species Treaty http://forum.starsonata.com/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=61642 |
Page 2 of 3 |
Author: | Zalistar [ Thu Jul 14, 2016 10:49 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Protected Species Treaty |
Greetings... Deep Space Federation /Signed |
Author: | Species 8472 [ Thu Jul 14, 2016 12:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Protected Species Treaty |
Members under the Protected Species Treaty will be subject to EXTENSIVE searches for replicator fugitives. SGC RE/UC accept no liability for any damage/deaths incurred during these searches. |
Author: | jack the ripper [ Thu Jul 14, 2016 1:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Protected Species Treaty |
![]() |
Author: | Fyuryus [ Fri Jul 15, 2016 6:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Protected Species Treaty |
Species 8472 wrote: Members under the Protected Species Treaty will be subject to EXTENSIVE searches for replicator fugitives. SGC RE/UC accept no liability for any damage/deaths incurred during these searches. Read: We're looking for any reason to use the space bar. Only against noob teams tho we don't want to fight an equal team. |
Author: | KonanCruss2 [ Sat Jul 16, 2016 2:48 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Protected Species Treaty |
Fyuryus wrote: Species 8472 wrote: Members under the Protected Species Treaty will be subject to EXTENSIVE searches for replicator fugitives. SGC RE/UC accept no liability for any damage/deaths incurred during these searches. Read: We're looking for any reason to use the space bar. Only against noob teams tho we don't want to fight an equal team. The salt is real. It's not like RE has warred RF right? |
Author: | the white wizard5 [ Sat Jul 16, 2016 5:55 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Protected Species Treaty |
True, re can not beat rf so its obvious that rf is picking on the weak re |
Author: | lordjeroen [ Sat Jul 16, 2016 6:20 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Protected Species Treaty |
RE surrenders to RF and will pay the payment they asked (1 DoW and a half Fruits). All aggression between RE and RF will end this evening, war will still stay for defense reasons. |
Author: | DarkSteel [ Sat Jul 16, 2016 9:59 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Protected Species Treaty |
I think you guys had the most boring endgame war of the last 5 years ![]() |
Author: | KonanCruss2 [ Sat Jul 16, 2016 3:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Protected Species Treaty |
heylo wrote: I think you guys had the most boring endgame war of the last 5 years ![]() Atleast there were no exploits used. |
Author: | Matt Wildfox 4 [ Sat Jul 16, 2016 5:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Protected Species Treaty |
KonanCruss2 wrote: heylo wrote: I think you guys had the most boring endgame war of the last 5 years ![]() Atleast there were no exploits used. https://www.rkz.nl/dutchburncentrebeverwijk |
Author: | ShawnMcCall [ Sat Jul 16, 2016 9:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Protected Species Treaty |
heylo wrote: I think you guys had the most boring endgame war of the last 5 years ![]() I bet it was over selling ICs to each other's bases ![]() |
Author: | Species 8472 [ Sun Jul 17, 2016 4:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Protected Species Treaty |
heylo wrote: I think you guys had the most boring endgame war of the last 5 years ![]() The initial sneaky assault downing 4 ada kit gals and then removal of the north #goldenkitgals was fun, it was only after that the boredom commenced. |
Author: | anilv [ Sun Jul 17, 2016 5:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Protected Species Treaty |
ShawnMcCall wrote: heylo wrote: I think you guys had the most boring endgame war of the last 5 years ![]() I bet it was over selling ICs to each other's bases ![]() I sincerely hope so. ![]() |
Author: | lrellok [ Sun Jul 31, 2016 2:52 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Protected Species Treaty |
So the destruction of Ascension Logistic Bases negates this treaty? |
Author: | kanescreed [ Sun Jul 31, 2016 2:56 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Protected Species Treaty |
lrellok wrote: So the destruction of Ascension Logistic Bases negates this treaty? da wat nao? |
Page 2 of 3 | All times are UTC - 5 hours |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |