Board Index | Search | Profile |
Page 2 of 3 |
[ 41 posts ] | Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3 Next |
Print view | Previous topic | Next topic |
Author | Message |
---|---|
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 1:43 pm Posts: 1352 |
Battlecruiser23 wrote: I suggested Rail Guns before. AEM attempted to troll me on the matter and said they're impossible with current code. I laid out how they'd work with current code, and AEM has only made one post(the I came back post) since. I'ma make a full pretty topic. Be prepared for The Great Wall of Churchill to be extended. I'm fairly sure that I suggested Rail Guns. I'm also fairly sure that I didn't "attempt to troll you". Actually, I spent over 15 hrs attempting to get rail guns to work with the resources available to me in C1 when this topic was first made. Rail guns are/were difficult to get to work due to bullet speed and/or using laser mechanics due to impact being limited to bullets, and at the time, Olympus was a top priority. Likewise, charging weapons weren't possible then: with the code surrounding sniper's analysis, there might be some interesting cross over. Suffice to say: if you're not writing the code, and you don't have access to it, you're spouting pixie dust. As we seem to be re-writing history, I'll keep it factual: I helped add all the original Gunner stuff (Jeff & John did the coding & the concept of missiles as disposable hulls), and I designed all the production BPs / factories, launchers, size/weight mechanics, crates and content surrounding them, as well as Hyperion, so I'm fairly "ok" with the gunner class & getting it to work. Gunner is top of my list after lowbie content, helping with special items & some (hopefully) new stuff that uses Jeff's new drop + capping code (and fixing things... Paxian missions are now completed + fixed for next patch: Hint: they're live on test). Stuff we're thinking about: *Weapons: Gunners currently stop at Excomms for HFs until T20, at which point they might use Zebra Spitters or Mzungu Warfares. Obviously, there's room for class locked weapons. *Rail guns: we'll see if it is doable. *Missiles: still stuck at T17 for mass producible consumption, barring Red Photon content. There's room for a lot more here. *Range / Role / Debuffing: we're well aware that Gunners simply aren't used for Olympus and other top end content. *Capital ships: we're aware that Zeus Throne isn't used and that Dreadnaughts suffer from requiring a ShM to be viable, and Zerkers are much more useful if a ShM is available. p.s. There's some smattering of small crumbs in the next patch, or uni restart, for Capital users just for starters. Last edited by Aurora Ex Machina on Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:28 pm, edited 2 times in total. |
Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:00 pm |
|
Main: Beelz
Level: 1 Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 11:57 pm Posts: 1544 |
uni restart? that means items (from ai base purchasing) or bases being added to the universe iirc since they can't be manually patched in?
_________________ |
Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:03 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 1:43 pm Posts: 1352 |
Asmodeaan wrote: uni restart? that means items (from ai base purchasing) or bases being added to the universe iirc since they can't be manually patched in? We'll probably add them manually, depending on time constraints. |
Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:08 pm |
|
Team:
Rank: Main: Stabberz Level: 2414 Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:55 am Posts: 3696 |
WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN?!
_________________ Blue Dwarf wrote: In space, no one can hear you cha cha cha. |
Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:44 pm |
|
over 9000!
Team:
Rank: Councilor Main: Churchill Level: 5620 Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:36 pm Posts: 11706 |
I suggested Rail Guns, and a female Dev that called herself very in tune with Gunner said impossible and kept saying impossible, until...
...I said, a gun with small bullet size, very high if not full tracking as a turret, very little if any bullet tracking(arcs), and very high projectile speeds(faster than projectiles + sniper). Said Dev shut up. _________________ Salt Assault drew this conclusion from the latest devblog. [img]http://oi62.tinypic.com/33208ex.jpg[/img] |
Fri Jan 20, 2012 9:10 pm |
|
Main: Sceadu
Level: 1913 Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 11:38 pm Posts: 1381 |
Maybe they just started ignoring you, because you don't have any idea what you're talking about, and you made that very clear?
_________________ http://www.fanfiction.net/u/1408128/Demiser_of_D landswimmer wrote: ALL HAIL CYG THE MESSIAH! |
Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:26 am |
|
Team:
Rank: Main: Stabberz Level: 2414 Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:55 am Posts: 3696 |
Cygnus wrote: Maybe they just started ignoring you, because you don't have any idea what you're talking about, and you made that very clear? Actually, Church did describe a railgun quite well. Railguns consist of a solid projectile that is sped up by magnetic forces along a pet of rail to achieve great velocity. A railgun today can speed up a 7 pound projectile to 5,400 miles per hour. So yes, it would be a fast moving projectile with low tracking and at least decent range, much like a Veneration Cylinder. _________________ Blue Dwarf wrote: In space, no one can hear you cha cha cha. |
Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:46 am |
|
Member
Team:
Rank: Peon Main: Dindu Nuffin Level: 3522 Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 4:44 pm Posts: 2156 Location: Californication |
Griffin wrote: Cygnus wrote: Maybe they just started ignoring you, because you don't have any idea what you're talking about, and you made that very clear? Actually, Church did describe a railgun quite well. Railguns consist of a solid projectile that is sped up by magnetic forces along a pet of rail to achieve great velocity. A railgun today can speed up a 7 pound projectile to 5,400 miles per hour. So yes, it would be a fast moving projectile with low tracking and at least decent range, much like a Veneration Cylinder. Bravo, you can google things _________________ Death to Pirates! http://img850.imageshack.us/img850/2103/mutes.jpg |
Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:52 am |
|
Team:
Rank: Main: Stabberz Level: 2414 Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:55 am Posts: 3696 |
I googled the statistics, but if someone doesn't know what a railgun is and has to have someone explain it to them...
_________________ Blue Dwarf wrote: In space, no one can hear you cha cha cha. |
Sat Jan 21, 2012 8:56 am |
|
Main: Sceadu
Level: 1913 Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 11:38 pm Posts: 1381 |
Nah, didn't really mean that, I more was talking about the coding side of things. Throughout all my stupid suggestions I've oft found that things I thought were literally seconds to do actually took days.
_________________ http://www.fanfiction.net/u/1408128/Demiser_of_D landswimmer wrote: ALL HAIL CYG THE MESSIAH! |
Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:09 pm |
|
over 9000!
Team:
Rank: Councilor Main: Churchill Level: 5620 Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:36 pm Posts: 11706 |
Magcannon Turret takes days to code when it already exists?
_________________ Salt Assault drew this conclusion from the latest devblog. [img]http://oi62.tinypic.com/33208ex.jpg[/img] |
Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:43 pm |
|
Main: Sceadu
Level: 1913 Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 11:38 pm Posts: 1381 |
Magcannon turret is TERRIBLY coded. Seriously, it's awful. There is absolutely no way we could use the same template to make another weapon, it just wouldn't work.
_________________ http://www.fanfiction.net/u/1408128/Demiser_of_D landswimmer wrote: ALL HAIL CYG THE MESSIAH! |
Sat Jan 21, 2012 1:49 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 1:43 pm Posts: 1352 |
Battlecruiser23 wrote: Magcannon Turret takes days to code when it already exists? I'm afraid you've no idea how it works. 36.7 3 MagCannon Turret No aim required mag 65.9 0.56 69 1,050 500 Uncommon Small 428,000 15,000 15 123 0 4000 energy 2 16 0.1 334 2000 20 0xffddb22b 20 4 300 0.2 0xffffffff 0x00ddb22b 0 0 1 366 exotic-specialized none missileshotgun 217 164.2 20 Mercurian MagCannon Mercurian Technology mag 223.4 0.74 268 1,200 900 Very Very Expensive Hard Build Heavy Small 3,865,918,000 394,000 197 364 0 7500 energy 2 35 0.0004 434 2000 22 0xFFD03C02 12 4 160 0.2 0xffD03C02 0xff5B02CA 0 0 1 1642 exotic-specialized none missileshotgun 268 A magcannon "turret" isn't a turret at all. It is a forward firing missileshotgun which inherits 0 velocity, but has extremely high turning (0.1, compared to all other missileshotguns that have 0.000x) and a high tracking level. So, essentially, it is a magcannon that starts at 0 speed, and turns so fast you don't notice it as it tracks its target - visibly it "appears" to shoot at a direction, but it doesn't do this at all. The first thing I attempted (because, you know, I'm not dumb) was a copy/paste but with a faster bullet speed, thus leading to my observations about "missing and then repeating with hilarious results". And that will be the last time we discuss code. |
Sat Jan 21, 2012 2:36 pm |
|
over 9000!
Team:
Rank: Councilor Main: Churchill Level: 5620 Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:36 pm Posts: 11706 |
Then do that for Rail Guns? If the code exists and mimics near exact what the suggestion was, why does it get scrapped and the devs work day and night until the next client .0 is finished?
_________________ Salt Assault drew this conclusion from the latest devblog. [img]http://oi62.tinypic.com/33208ex.jpg[/img] |
Sat Jan 21, 2012 4:18 pm |
|
Team:
Rank: Main: Stabberz Level: 2414 Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:55 am Posts: 3696 |
You know, we could probably just settle for low tracking, high speed torpedoes. Since they are really just about the same.
_________________ Blue Dwarf wrote: In space, no one can hear you cha cha cha. |
Sat Jan 21, 2012 6:50 pm |
|
Page 2 of 3 |
[ 41 posts ] | Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3 Next |
All times are UTC - 5 hours |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests |
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum |