Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
over 9000!
User avatar
Team: Axis Industries
Rank: Councilor
Main: Churchill
Level: 5620

Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:36 pm
Posts: 11706
Post [T21]Functioning Qi'Uka.
T21.
~100 size
10k bank
~120/s regen
100 regen elect
22 vis
10 elect usage
+15% speed
~300k weight
Light Fighter locked perhaps?

Drop from *any* future concept of Bana UZ, bp built otherwise.
Requires a Malf, fucking ton of bana commods like the Malf, and some other random DG Loot to build. And like 10b credits too?

_________________
Salt Assault drew this conclusion from the latest devblog.
[img]http://oi62.tinypic.com/33208ex.jpg[/img]


Thu Nov 17, 2011 10:02 pm
Profile
User avatar
Main: Bastamental
Level: 3586

Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 9:14 pm
Posts: 2395
Location: Behind you
Post Re: [T21]Functioning Qi'Uka.
Sexy :shock:

_________________
"Just wait till' I get my hermes..."

Image
Image

Jiraque wrote:
It's a seer thing.
Paxx wrote:
Use that yellow thingy on that zerk!


Thu Nov 17, 2011 10:04 pm
Profile
User avatar
Main: Spatzz
Level: 3104

Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 12:40 am
Posts: 3122
Post Re: [T21]Functioning Qi'Uka.
Could probably be better according to the balance sheets.

_________________
JeffL wrote:
Come have sex with me in space, my lord


Fri Nov 18, 2011 12:30 am
Profile
over 9000!
User avatar
Team: Axis Industries
Rank: Councilor
Main: Churchill
Level: 5620

Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:36 pm
Posts: 11706
Post Re: [T21]Functioning Qi'Uka.
Chaosking3 wrote:
Could probably be better according to the balance sheets.


I know. Was hoping for a like.

It's part of my "UrQa T21" selection of suggestions I archived.

_________________
Salt Assault drew this conclusion from the latest devblog.
[img]http://oi62.tinypic.com/33208ex.jpg[/img]


Fri Nov 18, 2011 12:41 am
Profile
User avatar
Team: Eminence Front
Rank:
Main: Chemo
Level: 3621

Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 10:23 am
Posts: 1341
Post Re: [T21]Functioning Qi'Uka.
Battlecruiser23 wrote:
T21.
~100 size
~300k weight
Light Fighter locked perhaps?


Haha! Maybe you forget Snipers don't fly LF's or get a hull bonus for them.

_________________
Never


Fri Nov 18, 2011 12:42 am
Profile YIM WWW
over 9000!
User avatar
Team: Axis Industries
Rank: Councilor
Main: Churchill
Level: 5620

Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:36 pm
Posts: 11706
Post Re: [T21]Functioning Qi'Uka.
I do like being sniper, but thats a bit too much regen imo for a sniper. I'd be pushing ~200 regen off mine, which is damn fast for a non shm. I also figured that seer is a flimsier thing.

Also, Slicer has a Panther Sniper. Random pvp from juju sniper vs panther sniper ftw! (It was a draw)

_________________
Salt Assault drew this conclusion from the latest devblog.
[img]http://oi62.tinypic.com/33208ex.jpg[/img]


Fri Nov 18, 2011 12:46 am
Profile
User avatar
Main: Spatzz
Level: 3104

Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 12:40 am
Posts: 3122
Post Re: [T21]Functioning Qi'Uka.
The Ares Shield line is very similar to that one and no such thing as to much regen!

_________________
JeffL wrote:
Come have sex with me in space, my lord


Fri Nov 18, 2011 1:08 am
Profile
over 9000!
User avatar
Team: Axis Industries
Rank: Councilor
Main: Churchill
Level: 5620

Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:36 pm
Posts: 11706
Post Re: [T21]Functioning Qi'Uka.
Well, I figured that the bana list could be put into T21. I thought, hmm, "could there be a non malf malf?" It sounds a bit silly if there isn't. Imagine if Ares gear stopped at "Bent" while the others went to T3. Kinda silly, right?

Also, there could be a T21 bana ship, like the 1400 spear. And a T21 bana energy, radar, cloak, etc.

_________________
Salt Assault drew this conclusion from the latest devblog.
[img]http://oi62.tinypic.com/33208ex.jpg[/img]


Fri Nov 18, 2011 1:14 am
Profile
Team: Red Faction
Rank:
Main: Paladin's Presence
Level: 3937

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 12:53 am
Posts: 6770
Post Re: [T21]Functioning Qi'Uka.
No Hull lock just ramp up the stats on the current one a bit and call it good. Really though, that's not even all that much better than a Malf so I am confused as to where it warrants the Hull lock.

_________________
Neba wrote:
BLACK PEOPLE DON'T GET RICE

andezrhode wrote:
goett wrote:
All oly ships look way to geometrically conservative for my tastes.

thats because most graphic designers are squares :mrgreen:

goett wrote:
Fired bullets taste like candy.


Fri Nov 18, 2011 1:57 am
Profile
over 9000!
User avatar
Team: Axis Industries
Rank: Councilor
Main: Churchill
Level: 5620

Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:36 pm
Posts: 11706
Post Re: [T21]Functioning Qi'Uka.
shawn_mccall wrote:
No Hull lock just ramp up the stats on the current one a bit and call it good. Really though, that's not even all that much better than a Malf so I am confused as to where it warrants the Hull lock.


Poseidon Hippios Surging Energy.
Admin reasoning on "Better than t20 for a certain class".

_________________
Salt Assault drew this conclusion from the latest devblog.
[img]http://oi62.tinypic.com/33208ex.jpg[/img]


Fri Nov 18, 2011 2:14 am
Profile
User avatar
Main: Spatzz
Level: 3104

Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 12:40 am
Posts: 3122
Post Re: [T21]Functioning Qi'Uka.
That is all good and fine but that has nothing to do with this item which is not exactly great for a t21 shield. Most t21 stuff seems to be avoiding hull lock and since this would be mainly used by snipers and seers limiting it to LF would not be the best idea.

_________________
JeffL wrote:
Come have sex with me in space, my lord


Fri Nov 18, 2011 3:17 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 77 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.