Being specific in suggestions attracts the gaze of the wise ones just suggest a base slot rebalance.. Job done

just saw someones comment who downvoted this and they are probably right, will people stop multi subbing if they get more slots? will they hell.

"Whilst more slots per account would be good, this would only serve to fuel the multi-client problem that is plaguing the game currently."

I have to agree with a sad heart hes probably right.

It should be quite easy to defend one galaxy and end up with tons of slots for CA and ExE with single developed account. Traders are known for building strong gals. Many of their gals have 4 t20 stm kits. That's only 36 slots used for defending a gal.

Yes you can you just can't run a multiple tril a uni enterprise.
We seem to be in a circle jerk, jeff can't ban multiple clienting cos he can't afford it, he can't open base slots because multi clienters would be making way too much money, single players are being turned off the game because of multi clienters , this might be turning enough players off to stop revenue getting to a stage where he could afford to ban multi clienting...

Actually he can easily open up account slots. They just need to make sure that holding multiple galaxies is sufficiently costly, in terms of kits and base augs.

see that isn't hard to do with one account. But then the issue is how do you fight back with stm bases in bvb?

Team helps. BvB is usually team vs team instead of player vs player.

Are there any theories as to why jeff hasn't already opened up base slots?

But what if your team consist of players competent in building a legit gal for themselves.

Exactly, BvB by itself is useless if you don't hold the gal after you take it. Otherwise the other team can simply come right back and reclaim the lost territory. So if you're already full up on station slots, you would have no reason to acquire more territory.

To kill the bad guys.

From Suit's Q&A blog: