http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/2 ... 1385526024

day one; a radical preacher is telling his followers to attack the US.

day two; his followers are in disbelief at being told that he's a big fan of gay porn.


its brilliant. i cant say that i think its morally right, but it is brilliant, because it doesnt involve taxpayers fronting the bill for a missile, it doesnt involve the risk of collateral damage, it doesnt have as much risk of blowback as a conventional op, and the person it is used against is only put in life threatening danger if their followers are radicalised enough to kill "in the name of allah"

still no trial, or due process, but i'm no fan of violent religious fundamentalists, and even less of a fan of hypocrites.


but it raises the question, if they can do this to someone who hates the US (this would require having an alternate explanation for how the information was uncovered, and it would require having someone not-connected to the US government to be the one who supposedly "found" the information) what's stopping them from doing it to anyone?

if the media supposedly "found out" that ron paul was a "massive fan of child porn" what possible recourse would he have? in the court of public opinion, "guilty forever, even when proven innocent" tends to hold true.

what would you do, what could you do if the government decided hack your computer and plant information to destroy your reputation and put your life in danger?

From both reading about things that have happened in the past 50 years and personal experience, I can conclude one thing: Deeply Religious people often have the most kinky/deviant desires.

i speak out against the US! but i dont have porn habits...