Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 78 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
Dev Team
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 4:02 pm
Posts: 236
Location: San Francisco
Post New Uni opinions - update
OK! Lots of good feedback which helps and I appreciate.

We are aware of the missing tier 3 commod problem and this will be fixed soon.

We are also considering making more galaxies base buildable to ease the limited space issue. And possibly upping the base limit in some galaxies. Stay tuned, nothing is set in stone just yet. But the space problem is probably due to the the odd (random) shape of this universe. We didn't mean for this to happen. Blame chaos theory. ;)

_________________
JonC :: Star Sonata Dev
Star Sonata » YouTube Channel :: Twitter Feed :: Bug Database :: Wiki
For support, please create a support ticket here.


Wed Oct 01, 2008 3:53 am
Profile WWW
over 9000!
User avatar
Team: Axis Industries
Rank: Councilor
Main: Churchill
Level: 5620

Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:36 pm
Posts: 11706
Post Re: New Uni opinions - update
lol cool

_________________
Salt Assault drew this conclusion from the latest devblog.
[img]http://oi62.tinypic.com/33208ex.jpg[/img]


Wed Oct 01, 2008 4:06 am
Profile
Member
User avatar
Team: Traders
Rank: Director
Main: ERMAN
Level: 8518

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 1:27 am
Posts: 840
Location: SW Michigan, USA
Post Re: New Uni opinions - update
about building problems, I liked the idea that voomy came up with that each account can flag one gal and only one gal. That would reward those of us with multiple accounts and make it fair for all p2p....However, I would still like to see a uni large enough where there are just too many gals to build in. I understand the constraints on the server, but I'm sure my favorite dev team will think of a feasible way to make building a possibility for everyone who wants to.

_________________
"I reject your reality, and substitute my own."
"If I were an enzyme, I'd be DNA Helicase so I could unzip your genes."


Wed Oct 01, 2008 11:28 am
Profile WWW
User avatar
Team: Aidelon
Rank: Director
Main: goldstar-stations
Level: 6543

Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 12:54 pm
Posts: 1174
Post Re: New Uni opinions - update
erman wrote:
about building problems, I liked the idea that voomy came up with that each account can flag one gal and only one gal. That would reward those of us with multiple accounts and make it fair for all p2p....However, I would still like to see a uni large enough where there are just too many gals to build in. I understand the constraints on the server, but I'm sure my favorite dev team will think of a feasible way to make building a possibility for everyone who wants to.



hmm from what id heard the liquid server still works,we also have test.starsonata.com and we have kattare. maybe admins can shove the uni-type stuff on one server?

well anyway they know what they can and can't do. it may be that they can't rework it that way without C2. guess we wait and see. :P

_________________
Image


Wed Oct 01, 2008 2:14 pm
Profile
Team: Star Revolution X
Rank:
Main: Phoenix Rising(CA)
Level: 2028

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 10:10 pm
Posts: 38
Post Re: New Uni opinions - update
so there are currently no tier 3 commods in game? or are they just not extracting?


Sat Oct 04, 2008 7:15 am
Profile
User avatar
Team: Admins
Rank: Councilor
Main: The Voomy One
Level: 1337

Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 12:06 am
Posts: 4137
Post Re: New Uni opinions - update
They dont exist. They will be randomly added soon though, we are currently testing it on the test server.


Sat Oct 04, 2008 7:35 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 5:06 am
Posts: 675
Location: The Universe
Post Re: New Uni opinions - update
About upping the base max for gals can you lower the maximum amount of bases per persons in w0 gals?

_________________
I don't like the looser, travian, if you don't, put this in your signature.
Image


Mon Oct 06, 2008 3:13 am
Profile
User avatar
Team: Triple Alliance
Rank: Director
Main: Biggee
Level: 3017

Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 4:27 pm
Posts: 659
Post Re: New Uni opinions - update
Greo0 wrote:
About upping the base max for gals can you lower the maximum amount of bases per persons in w0 gals?

Yeah. Like 1 per ACCOUNT.

_________________
uhmari wrote:
When i look at uhmari, I can see clearly the problems in it


Mon Oct 06, 2008 4:05 am
Profile
over 9000!
User avatar
Team: Axis Industries
Rank: Councilor
Main: Churchill
Level: 5620

Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:36 pm
Posts: 11706
Post Re: New Uni opinions - update
biggee531 wrote:
Greo0 wrote:
About upping the base max for gals can you lower the maximum amount of bases per persons in w0 gals?

Yeah. Like 1 per ACCOUNT.


then they'll just make tougher f2p bases

_________________
Salt Assault drew this conclusion from the latest devblog.
[img]http://oi62.tinypic.com/33208ex.jpg[/img]


Mon Oct 06, 2008 4:22 am
Profile
User avatar
Team: Triple Alliance
Rank: Director
Main: Biggee
Level: 3017

Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 4:27 pm
Posts: 659
Post Re: New Uni opinions - update
Idc, i wouldn't even care if we didn't lock them to nexus if they didn't spam bases. But they do, so we will have to lock them away and bring them food every once in a while.

_________________
uhmari wrote:
When i look at uhmari, I can see clearly the problems in it


Mon Oct 06, 2008 7:11 am
Profile
over 9000!
User avatar
Team: Axis Industries
Rank: Councilor
Main: Churchill
Level: 5620

Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 10:36 pm
Posts: 11706
Post Re: New Uni opinions - update
biggee531 wrote:
Idc, i wouldn't even care if we didn't lock them to nexus if they didn't spam bases. But they do, so we will have to lock them away and bring them food every once in a while.


reasons why they spam bases:

noobs
1. first, they dont know how to make a decent base that can handle the w0 ai
2. the admins dont have a tutorial for base making
3. they dont understand how to run a base
4. when bases are destroyd, they start over

f2p prats
1. they notice that the p2p want w0, so they spam shells and sell slots for some cash
2. they have been ripped off somehow and want revenge, without getting hurt
3. they use the invinsible thing as a santuary
4. the f2p are kicked out of the crappy w1 gals so they spam w0 with what would have been in that crappy gal with just a smidgen of mets of the worse possible suit single planet.

70% of the time is just noobs. the other 20% is made up f2p teams and the final 10% is f2p teams who know what they are doing and long term f2p

because the admins dont pop a fill-the-screen tutorial in the f2p's face before they leave the nexus, the f2p really dont understand. then the p2p complain and whine and cry, which make the admins do nothing for the p2p's punishment.

so, it's the admins' fault for no huge mandatory tutorial of every aspect of bases, but the players make the admins do nothing by whining and crying and bugging them nearing the point where the admins would start deleting accs to shut us up.

_________________
Salt Assault drew this conclusion from the latest devblog.
[img]http://oi62.tinypic.com/33208ex.jpg[/img]


Mon Oct 06, 2008 10:10 am
Profile
Member

Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 9:53 pm
Posts: 696
Location: South-Western Germany
Post Re: New Uni opinions - update
It's disturbing that the stuff has so less control over the randomization of the universe even there are the esential parameters for a satisfying randomization available in game already.

Just to name the most important - and obvious - of those once again:

I) warp navigation lvl - aka w0, w1, w2, w3

II) DF - Danger Factor

It should be easily implementable - or the design and documentation of your code is terrible - to bind the placement of

- number of gals
- special gals (e.g. Lavanite)
- commods according to their quantity and their Tier lvl (e.g. Bunch of metals for w0, but Frozen Blob for w3)
- ruins (just like commods, e.g. none in w0, but Kikale M. in DF 120+)
- suitable colony planets (according to their quality)
- buildable spots - means the number of gals in w0, w1, ... and the number and quality (see the above three points) of planets & moons
- Asteroid belts

according to I) and II). Also the game is old enough to have qualitativly good values for the relative distribution of those according to I) and II).

Implementing this would solve a lot of hassle that one sees each new uni.

Even the - again - tiny w0 has enough spots for a statistical "good" distribution of attached buildable spots and their quality.


Mon Oct 06, 2008 6:27 pm
Profile
Main: Minch
Level: 2357

Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 11:05 am
Posts: 33
Location: Wales , South Wales
Post Re: New Uni opinions - update
lol @ the f2p's!!

- Minch


Tue Oct 07, 2008 12:34 pm
Profile
Dev Team
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2007 4:02 pm
Posts: 236
Location: San Francisco
Post Re: New Uni opinions - update
Update: We are working patch soon, in the next day or two ideally. We've been delayed a somewhat by some new bugs discovered in our testing on Test.

_________________
JonC :: Star Sonata Dev
Star Sonata » YouTube Channel :: Twitter Feed :: Bug Database :: Wiki
For support, please create a support ticket here.


Tue Oct 07, 2008 12:43 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar
Team: Imperium
Rank: Officer
Main: Muffasa
Level: 7626

Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 11:09 am
Posts: 507
Post Re: New Uni opinions - update
JonC wrote:
Blame chaos theory. ;)


A doctor, an architect, and a computer scientist were arguing about whose profession was the oldest. In the course of their arguments, they got all the way back to the Garden of Eden, whereupon the doctor said, "The medical profession is clearly the oldest, because Eve was made from Adam's rib, as the story goes, and that was a simply incredible surgical feat."

The architect did not agree. He said, "But if you look at the Garden itself, in the beginning there was chaos and void, and out of that, the Garden and the world were created. So God must have been an architect."

The computer scientist, who had listened to all of this said, "Yes, but where do you think the chaos came from?"


Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:23 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 78 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 76 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.