Board Index | Search | Profile |
Page 1 of 2 |
[ 25 posts ] | Go to page 1, 2 Next |
Print view | Previous topic | Next topic |
Author | Message |
---|---|
Site Admin / Dev Team
Team:
Rank: Director Main: Jeff_L Level: 1969 Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 2:21 am Posts: 3894 Location: Santa Clara, CA |
We had a final test tonight using a virtual server in Amazon's EC2 cloud computing to run a Star Sonata server, databases, web site, and forum, and it seemed to go very well. There were about 40 people that came over to help test, and most people reported an improved connection. The performance metrics seemed to indicate that the overall server framerate was nearly the same as what we're getting on Kattare, but the max lag in a 20 minute period was around 300ms, whereas Kattare suffers infrequent lags of up to 3000ms. The total bandwidth of EC2 also seems to be much greater. We're leaving it up overnight to see if the process degrades at all over time. If you're quick, you can still test it by pointing your client to liberty.starsonata.com.
There are still a couple of things we need to fix in order to move everything over to EC2, but I expect we will be moving the official live server over there fairly soon. _________________ For support, please create a support ticket here and I will get back to you as soon as possible. About Star Sonata. |
Sun Dec 21, 2008 4:53 am |
|
Team:
Rank: Operator Main: norrath Level: 1951 Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 12:28 pm Posts: 3204 Location: in my secret lair planing the downfall of mankind |
Wont that 300ms lag increase with a larger active playerbase on it? If so how much do you expect it to increase?
Also, where is the Liberty server located? And one last thing, if this drastically lowers lag, will you marry me? _________________ Tobal wrote: I think Jesus V2 needs a cake... Aurora Ex Machina wrote: Julian cannot post, because the FBI are watching |
Sun Dec 21, 2008 5:41 pm |
|
Site Admin / Dev Team
Team:
Rank: Director Main: Jeff_L Level: 1969 Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 2:21 am Posts: 3894 Location: Santa Clara, CA |
Well, EC2 seems to have very fast I/O. The 3000ms lags we get on Kattare is all in DB reads. I don't remember what the biggest lag on a DB read I saw on EC2, but it was something like 120ms. The biggest lag on EC2 that I saw was in galaxy::IdleAll -- probably when a bunch of DG's were going to sleep or something. So basically the thing that is lagging Kattare seems to hardly lag EC2 at all, so I don't think that 300ms will go up much with more players. (fingers crossed)
I'm not sure where it is located, other than a cloud in the US. Maybe Jey knows better. We are running on a virtual machine that is hosted by Amazon's cloud, not an actual machine located somewhere. I mean, it is running on some sort of actual machine somewhere at any one time, but it can be handed off to another machine automatically for whatever reason at any time, I believe, without us noticing. No. _________________ For support, please create a support ticket here and I will get back to you as soon as possible. About Star Sonata. |
Sun Dec 21, 2008 8:37 pm |
|
Team:
Rank: Operator Main: norrath Level: 1951 Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 12:28 pm Posts: 3204 Location: in my secret lair planing the downfall of mankind |
JeffL wrote: Well, EC2 seems to have very fast I/O. The 3000ms lags we get on Kattare is all in DB reads. I don't remember what the biggest lag on a DB read I saw on EC2, but it was something like 120ms. The biggest lag on EC2 that I saw was in galaxy::IdleAll -- probably when a bunch of DG's were going to sleep or something. So basically the thing that is lagging Kattare seems to hardly lag EC2 at all, so I don't think that 300ms will go up much with more players. (fingers crossed) I'm not sure where it is located, other than a cloud in the US. Maybe Jey knows better. We are running on a virtual machine that is hosted by Amazon's cloud, not an actual machine located somewhere. I mean, it is running on some sort of actual machine somewhere at any one time, but it can be handed off to another machine automatically for whatever reason at any time, I believe, without us noticing. No. Awesome. *starts hunting down Jey* Damn. _________________ Tobal wrote: I think Jesus V2 needs a cake... Aurora Ex Machina wrote: Julian cannot post, because the FBI are watching |
Sun Dec 21, 2008 9:53 pm |
|
Main: Nyarlathotep
Level: 1854 Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 8:17 am Posts: 3978 Location: Classified |
Heh, new signature ftw.
Anyway, sounds great, does this mean the uni won't lag as much as it ages? _________________ Dorin Nube wrote: Nipples aren't the only danger here. |
Sun Dec 21, 2008 10:16 pm |
|
Dev Team
Team:
Rank: Officer Main: Jey123456 Level: 4359 Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 11:51 pm Posts: 3366 Location: who knows ? |
The servers are somewhere in the us-east. If i remember correctly, there are 3 locations where it could end up when we start it. It would never be switched while actually running. But if we stop it for a while and start a new one, it could be at another location still on the east coast.
Bandwith wise, from the test i could do, were talking of at least 10 times faster than kattare (thats a very least). On the performance issue, the disk io is a lot faster than our current server, resulting in a lot less delay in db access. Not to mention that we have more options to fix lag issue quickly compared to kattare. _________________ One of the first and proud flight controller. Visit our website: http://www.ef-team.com |
Sun Dec 21, 2008 11:31 pm |
|
Team:
Rank: Director Main: goldstar-stations Level: 6543 Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2005 12:54 pm Posts: 1174 |
Jey123456 wrote: The servers are somewhere in the us-east. If i remember correctly, there are 3 locations where it could end up when we start it. It would never be switched while actually running. But if we stop it for a while and start a new one, it could be at another location still on the east coast. Bandwith wise, from the test i could do, were talking of at least 10 times faster than kattare (thats a very least). On the performance issue, the disk io is a lot faster than our current server, resulting in a lot less delay in db access. Not to mention that we have more options to fix lag issue quickly compared to kattare. sweeeeeeeeeeeeeeet.. _________________ |
Mon Dec 22, 2008 12:17 am |
|
Team:
Rank: Main: Daggoth Level: 3912 Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 9:37 pm Posts: 4438 Location: Married to: CSE |
/me hugs Jeff and Jey
My names Josh lolz 3 J's.... anyways this sounds very good. Any fix to lag (albiet not complete) would make the game more appealing. Kanga _________________ Illegitimi Non Carborundum |
Mon Dec 22, 2008 1:15 pm |
|
Team:
Rank: Officer Main: Maxathron Level: 4065 Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2006 11:16 am Posts: 5804 |
isn't liberty.sta.... the old server adress ?
|
Tue Dec 30, 2008 5:43 am |
|
Team:
Rank: Director Main: Takuhi Level: 966 Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 9:15 am Posts: 212 |
It was liquid.starsonata.com. I think.
_________________ DO NOT GOOGLE ZONURA |
Tue Dec 30, 2008 9:37 am |
|
Team:
Rank: Main: Daggoth Level: 3912 Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 9:37 pm Posts: 4438 Location: Married to: CSE |
Takuhi wrote: It was liquid.starsonata.com. I think. aye, liquid was old, rb-ridden, laggy, bugged, but still coolz Kanga _________________ Illegitimi Non Carborundum |
Tue Dec 30, 2008 3:02 pm |
|
Member
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 9:53 pm Posts: 696 Location: South-Western Germany |
The new server has improved my gameplay as a Seer much.
It has nearly halfed my averaged ping time to 100 - 110ms (before 190 - 200). But more important is that the odd few seconds lag - which is as Seer not only annoying but often also critical - which had become common in the last few weeks is now rarly seen. I also have observed that this type of lag has been a bit different but I don't have exact data on it: - AIs reappear more often in different location after lag - looks like it used a PWI - AIs - in this case observed on prog rosies as I do them often in the same DG over and over - react different after lag, the movement and retaliaton fire (after a missed shot cause of lag) differs from the old server Is the "ping liberty.starsonata.com" the right approach now to track down ping time or is it a forefront relay? |
Thu Jan 01, 2009 7:52 pm |
|
Dev Team
Team:
Rank: Officer Main: Jey123456 Level: 4359 Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 11:51 pm Posts: 3366 Location: who knows ? |
the ping is the right approach. if you could do a constant ping and check if it changed while you noticed those "different lags" it could be of use to find out where this lag is coming from.
_________________ One of the first and proud flight controller. Visit our website: http://www.ef-team.com |
Thu Jan 01, 2009 11:35 pm |
|
Team:
Rank: Operator Main: norrath Level: 1951 Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 12:28 pm Posts: 3204 Location: in my secret lair planing the downfall of mankind |
Jey123456 wrote: the ping is the right approach. if you could do a constant ping and check if it changed while you noticed those "different lags" it could be of use to find out where this lag is coming from. And for those who didnt go to computer nerd school how do you do that? _________________ Tobal wrote: I think Jesus V2 needs a cake... Aurora Ex Machina wrote: Julian cannot post, because the FBI are watching |
Fri Jan 02, 2009 8:46 pm |
|
Team:
Rank: Councilor Main: Trevor Level: 5369 Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 10:01 pm Posts: 4162 Location: Alabama |
-t i think
_________________ Stay strong, live long, and walk humbly. |
Fri Jan 02, 2009 8:53 pm |
|
Page 1 of 2 |
[ 25 posts ] | Go to page 1, 2 Next |
All times are UTC - 5 hours |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 99 guests |
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum |