Board Index | Search | Profile |
Page 3 of 3 |
[ 44 posts ] | Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3 |
Print view | Previous topic | Next topic |
Author | Message |
---|---|
Team:
Rank: Soldier Main: crazyhorse2 Level: 3237 Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 7:29 pm Posts: 309 |
Ok i added engines and a few things that helped make it spacey. give your thoughts plz.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post. _________________ CrazyHorse http://nateportfolio.webs.com/ |
Wed Jan 29, 2014 3:42 pm |
|
Main: Ununoctium
Level: 5960 Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 5:27 pm Posts: 1773 |
lal wrote: the fact they haven't used it, that's all you really need to know, untill then it's useless for viability for an actual use, i mean i CAN use certain things to do certain tasks, but other things are certainly more superior "The Solar Sail Demonstrator will launch on a Falcon 9 in 2015". Okay so now you've shamed us all with your concrete logic, leave. As for the updated ship, it still looks nice but doesn't really seem much 'spacier' to me. I can't really think of any suggestions except shifting those masts to each side of the ship (sort of like two versions of the ship stuck keel to keel). It just doesn't fit with all the other (extremely flat) ships in SS. _________________ Space for rent! |
Wed Jan 29, 2014 4:25 pm |
|
Team:
Rank: Director Main: Biggee Level: 3017 Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 4:27 pm Posts: 659 |
It looks like it's an insane amount of polys. Like 6-8k? It's hard to tell.
_________________ uhmari wrote: When i look at uhmari, I can see clearly the problems in it |
Wed Jan 29, 2014 4:38 pm |
|
Team:
Rank: Soldier Main: crazyhorse2 Level: 3237 Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 7:29 pm Posts: 309 |
its only 11234 polys
_________________ CrazyHorse http://nateportfolio.webs.com/ |
Wed Jan 29, 2014 4:46 pm |
|
Team:
Rank: Director Main: Biggee Level: 3017 Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 4:27 pm Posts: 659 |
james5 wrote: its only 11234 polys Is that triangles, or just rectangle poly count? _________________ uhmari wrote: When i look at uhmari, I can see clearly the problems in it |
Wed Jan 29, 2014 4:49 pm |
|
Team:
Rank: Soldier Main: crazyhorse2 Level: 3237 Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 7:29 pm Posts: 309 |
sorry this is the right one.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post. _________________ CrazyHorse http://nateportfolio.webs.com/ |
Wed Jan 29, 2014 4:52 pm |
|
Team:
Rank: Director Main: Biggee Level: 3017 Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 4:27 pm Posts: 659 |
Yeah... That's a shitton of polys. All of the "4 vertex" polys are actually 2 polys because they get converted into triangles on .obj export. That's like 20k+
Dreadnoughts are less than half of that. _________________ uhmari wrote: When i look at uhmari, I can see clearly the problems in it |
Wed Jan 29, 2014 5:07 pm |
|
over 9000!
Main: enkelin
Level: 5600 Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 12:28 pm Posts: 11109 |
Could probably do with a lot fewer polys on the sails without compromising the look.
_________________ Hi, I'm Anil, a long-time player turned developer. I am Star Sonata's lead content developer, which means that I run weekly dev meetings and make sure that any proposed changes to the game receive proper review before going live. http://www.starsonata.com/features |
Wed Jan 29, 2014 5:10 pm |
|
Main: 8834746
Level: 0 Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2013 12:46 am Posts: 135 |
The Salty One wrote: lal wrote: the fact they haven't used it, that's all you really need to know, untill then it's useless for viability for an actual use, i mean i CAN use certain things to do certain tasks, but other things are certainly more superior "The Solar Sail Demonstrator will launch on a Falcon 9 in 2015". Okay so now you've shamed us all with your concrete logic, leave. As for the updated ship, it still looks nice but doesn't really seem much 'spacier' to me. I can't really think of any suggestions except shifting those masts to each side of the ship (sort of like two versions of the ship stuck keel to keel). It just doesn't fit with all the other (extremely flat) ships in SS. its a demonstrator and in 2015, oh wait it isnt 2015 yet? sorry, i must of missed it since we just entered 2014 |
Wed Jan 29, 2014 5:10 pm |
|
Team:
Rank: Soldier Main: crazyhorse2 Level: 3237 Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 7:29 pm Posts: 309 |
They do not get converted to triangles whwn exported to .obj... and ss can handle atleast 25 of these in sol with no lag
_________________ CrazyHorse http://nateportfolio.webs.com/ |
Wed Jan 29, 2014 5:30 pm |
|
Content Dev
Team:
Rank: Director Main: Blue Dwarf Level: 2067 Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2011 5:39 pm Posts: 3336 |
james5 wrote: They do not get converted to triangles whwn exported to .obj... and ss can handle atleast 25 of these in sol with no lag I think this depends on the exporter, but either way irrlicht doesn't like 4 point polys (I had lighting bugs from a mesh using 4 point polys). _________________ "What you mean you killed him cha cha cha?!" Support |
Wed Jan 29, 2014 5:50 pm |
|
Team:
Rank: Director Main: Biggee Level: 3017 Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 4:27 pm Posts: 659 |
james5 wrote: They do not get converted to triangles whwn exported to .obj... and ss can handle atleast 25 of these in sol with no lag They should be converted on export, but if they aren't, the engine still renders them as triangles and performs calculations as if they were triangles. It isn't about what "seems to work" or what "seems fine", it's about being efficient with the resources you have. You can accomplish almost the exact same look with a tenth of the polys. What happens 6 months from now when all the new content is 20k+ polys per model and people with high end systems start lagging like crazy because there are inefficient models everywhere all the time? What about systems now that can barely get 30fps on low? What about multi-clienting? You have to be smart about it and make as small of an impact as possible while still making it look badass. The sails could be like 100 polys each and still look really nice. The engine parts could be slimmed way down, the hull could be slimmed way down, the deck, the front, all of it could be a lot more simple while still retaining the look 100%. It would look a lot cleaner, too and it would be a lot easier to manage. It also makes it easier to texture when your UVs are a lot bigger. It's not as much of a pain in the ass to setup the UV map in a good layout. It's a really cool looking ship, but it's absolutely not suitable for a game asset at 20k+ polys. I don't even think some EVE battleships or carriers clock in at near that many polys. Hell, i'd be surprised if Titans were even 20k honestly, or even stations. _________________ uhmari wrote: When i look at uhmari, I can see clearly the problems in it |
Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:05 pm |
|
Content Dev
Team:
Rank: Director Main: Blue Dwarf Level: 2067 Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2011 5:39 pm Posts: 3336 |
I think your (crazyhorse) problem might be that you don't know how to do the texturing parts as well as Biggee does, which is where a lot of details come from, not the model. A great example of this is this image from Wikipedia on normal mapping (and yes, the SS client can use normal map and specular maps):
_________________ "What you mean you killed him cha cha cha?!" Support |
Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:13 pm |
|
Team:
Rank: Soldier Main: crazyhorse2 Level: 3237 Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 7:29 pm Posts: 309 |
First off, if you want ss to be efficient then like 90% of ss's models need to remade or fixed, because most of the models in the game have parts just thrown in and not connected, with seams like it would not be a problem, but in the long run it is. the only time you should had stuff unconnected is if it is moving. Every one of my models are 100% connected, unless the part is ment to move.
Yes I put over detail on models because I can not texture wreath shit, to i make up for that in the model. Also note that this model is from that I have done for a competition so there are more polys because of that reason. _________________ CrazyHorse http://nateportfolio.webs.com/ |
Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:33 pm |
|
Page 3 of 3 |
[ 44 posts ] | Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3 |
All times are UTC - 5 hours |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests |
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum |